Monday, April 20, 2020

Timespace free essay sample

One of the reasons this best of compilation is so good is because its more than just a nicely arranged package of Top 40 hits. Though most of Nicks solo chart-toppers are included, there are also a few overlooked gems from past albums that, apparently, Stevie and her record company felt deserved a place in this collection. These precious songs include Beauty and the Beast and Has Anyone Ever Written Anything For You which are truly not only beautiful but timeless as well. Another reason this collection stands above the rest is the addition of three new songs to complement the old. And in these songs, Nicks enlisted four of rock musics most innovative for inspiration and guidance: Jon Bon Jovi and Billy Falcon who wrote Sometimes Its a Bitch for her and Bret Michaels (of the band Poison) who wrote Loves A Hard Game To Play, and Tom Pettys long-time friend and musical collaborator, Michael Campbell, who aids Nicks in Desert Angel, which was written for all the men and women who lost their lives during the Gulf War. We will write a custom essay sample on Timespace or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The new material is well written and, generally well executed; however, the spirit of this musical achievement resides in Nicks past accomplishments. Stevie Nicks post-Fleetwood Mac contributions to music are, arguably, her most prolific. Her 1981 debut LP, Bella Donna, not only topped the rock and pop billboard charts, but also gave her a new and separate identity away from Fleetwood Mac. Subsequent solo albums have all been million-plus sellers and combined have yielded a string of memorable hits, which include Edge of Seventeen, Stop Draggin My Heart Around, Stand Back, and Talk to Me. These, and many more, are offered here, and, due to a little technological manipulation, have been greatly enhanced in sound quality. In essence, this musical anthology is impressive. It showcases the contributions of one of rock musics most interesting female performers in a way that both flatters her unique style and adds depth to her commercial successes. n

Sunday, March 15, 2020

Assisted Suicide

Assisted Suicide Free Online Research Papers Most of us are born into this world without pain and suffering. The trauma of our birth is usually is left only on our mother, and we hear about it every year on our birthday. More often than not we grow up and live our lives free from physical pain and suffering. Many of us will have the occasional broken bone or repair surgery during our life. These are often short recoveries, which allow us to live relatively pain free lives. As we enter the last stage of our lives where dying is the outcome, most of us expect not to suffer. While we walk the line on the issue of assisted suicide, we must ask ourselves if being alive is the same as living. If a person has stage four cancer and is in constant unbearable pain, doctors do what they can to ease their pain with medication. What if their pain can not be managed by medication and they want to end their suffering. How do we ignore their wishes and let them suffer ? We can not let people suffer Quality of life is more important than quantity of life. We end the lives of suffering animals whether they are pets or game that we eat. We obviously give more value to human life than we do animals, yet we won’t allow the animals to suffer. It does not seem logical to value human life the way we say we do, and not ensure that death is valued as much as life. How can we let people suffer when they are dying? Do we allow people to suffer because we want to avoid person confliction within ourselves or do we avoid being judged by the masses? Can we reflect on our own lives and the lives of our loved ones and say that we want to suffer when we die. Anyone who can feel pain will say they do not want to be in constant pain and do not want to suffer when they are dying. Those that want their suffering to stop by ending their lives, should be allowed to be assisted in how they leave this earth. The rules of who can be assisted in their death, must be clear and concise. There must be strict criteria for assistance to be given to someone who is terminally ill. There can not be room for doctors or family to hasten death for any other reason than that of the patient wishes. The application of the assistance would have to be regulated and safeguards placed to ensure the integrity of the assistance would not be compromised. Many people are taught to treat others as we ourselves wish to be treated. As to this issue we do not treat others this way, we allow personal issues of beliefs cloud our thinking. On one hand we can look at assisted suicide as aiding in a murder. For most people murder is unacceptable and wrong so they are against assisted suicide based on that belief. If the intent is not to kill but to end suffering how can it be the same as murder? Ending the suffering of someone who is in pain, is a natural biological response that most people have within them. A mother cleans and bandages a skinned knee of her child when they fall off their bike. She may also offer a icepack or medication to aide and ease the child’s pain. A husband rubbing his wife’s back to help relieve her pain while she is in labor during child birth. The doctor that gives pain management medications also aides the women to ease the suffering and pain of childbirth. Yet we won’t help someone with end stage pancreatic cancer end their suffering and excruciating pain. It is absurd to consider making into law in which aiding in the death of our weak and suffering is accepted. As we open the door to assist people in ending their lives, we open the door for people to take advantage of those weak and suffering people. Doctors would be allowed to make judgment calls, providing lethal action when it is unwanted or unwarranted.† Considering legalization to be the first step on a slippery slope that ends with physicians exerting pressure on the elderly to be euthanized to free up a hospital bed, or even to doctors killing patients without their consentâ€Å"(Young, 2010. p. B.7 ). This also opens up argument of what is acceptable and what is not. Doctors swear an oath to do no harm and to not give anyone medications that they do not need to treat an ailment, so doctors assisting suicide are actually going against this oath. There are types of assisting in someone’s suicide. There is passive assistance and active assistance when a person helps in the suicide of another. While one is actively aiding someone in dying where drugs may be administered to hasten death, passive assistance is withholding treatment in order for death to occur naturally. Is there is a clear difference between removing a feeding or breathing tube, and actively injecting a medication that stopped someone’s heart. It is reasonable to say that giving someone something that ends their life, actually aides in killing them. Taking something away, means that there would be not benefit from having it in place. â€Å"If further care is unlikely to be of any therapeutic benefit, a physician is not obliged to continue therapy.†(Clarke Egan, 2009). Many would view this as being the same thing, as the end result gives you death. Along with passive and active assisted suicide, there are a few other areas of assistance that need to be looked at. The voluntary act of having someone aide you in killing yourself is knowing what is at hand.† A patient must understand the condition, prognosis, and proposed therapy, and be able to reason consistently and to act on the basis of such reasoning. A patient must be able to communicate their choice and the reasons for that choice and understand the practical consequences of their choice†(Clarke Egan, 2009). Involuntary assistance is one of the most important aspects of this issue, as this assistance is when a patient can not speak for themselves but for most instances, a family member makes the choice on the outcome of life and death for the patient. This issues poses several concerns. How can the hospitals and doctors be sure that the person in charge of making this crucial decision has the patients wishes or best interests in mind. Is this person the best one to making the decision and are their motives clear and unblemished? â€Å"Jennifer Allwood thought it would be merciful to smother her 67-year-old father who had cancer. He was able to fight back and survived†.(Clarke Egan, 2009). Making a decision that can not be changed and the outcome hazardous should not be allowed to be made legal. The issue of assisted suicide will likely be debated for a long time to come. Looking at what benefits that come from it seem silly, for a few people to die faster. With all of the technology and advances in pain management, the actual need for someone to need to kill themselves smaller than one may think. â€Å"Having considered both sides of the issue, our conviction is that, after all, it is far better for the welfare of society to let a few suffer, and not run the risk of creating crime and criminals. It appears to us that there is ample reason to dread that the practice of euthanasia would, in the long run, cause more harm than good. That is why the law, laboring as it always does for the good of majority, has logically prohibited it (Appel,2004). People have the right to decide how they want to die and there is no need for anyone to suffer as their life is ending. People have in the past made the choice to help others end their suffering in times when the person could not consent, but clearly was suffering and in excruciating pain. A woman was given a fatal dose of morphine when she was close to death in order to prevent further suffering. The case was that of an army colonels wife in New York State who had attempted suicide by removing all the woolen blankets and slow burning material off her bed, then lying on a heavy straw mattress and setting fire to it. The woman was a horrible sight to behold and was literally roasted alive; when she lifted her arm to shake hands with Kempster, the flesh dropped from the bone, leaving the forearm absolutely bare. A certain end was only a few hours away, every moment was torture of the most horrible kind, and the patient was shrieking with agony while waiting for death to relieve her from her suffering. The womans personal physician indicated that he intended to inject her with only ten drops of morphine; Kempster, called in to consult, advised him to fill the syringe-and when the personal physician refused to take responsibility for such a decisive step, Kempster took hold of the needle and administered the fatal dose himself.5 Not only did he believe he had done right-a judgment allegedly confirmed by the priest who had been called in to administer the womans last rites-but he expressed his firm intention, if necessary, to end actively the lives of other patients. Kempster said that he never went on a journey-and he [had] been all over the world-without taking with him the means by which to end the life of an unfortunate human being who might be injured in an accident beyond the hope of recovery, and whose sufferings were severe(Appel,2004). How can we turn our backs on the ones that are suffering when they can not come back from the road to death? We all deserve the right to die with dignity and free from pain. Three key points that support active assisted suicide are â€Å" the relief of intractable pain, the respect for autonomy and the closely related fear of a loss of dignity that accompanies the loss of autonomy†(Clarke Egan, 2009). Seventy percent of the people polled in a survey favored to â€Å"allow doctors to comply with the wishes of a dying patient in severe distress who asks to have his or her life ended(Jannetti, April, 2010). This percent is very high considering that in most states in the United States outlaw assisted suicide. The number of people who want it to be available must advocate that it is there for them if and when they need someone to aide them in dying, instead of suffering the pain that they may have to endure otherwise. Living is not the same as being alive and if more of us understood that premise then much of this argument may not need to be expressed. In the end, we must do what is best for the people who are suffering and adhere to their wants and wishes. We must honor them by allowing them to leave this world as free of pain and suffering as they entered it. References: Clarke D.L.,( 2009) MMed Sci, MBA. Department of General Surgery, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Complex Egan, A. SJ, PhD(2009). The Jesuit Institute – South Africa, Victory Park, Johannesburg Lachman. L (2010). Medsurg Nursing. Pitman:Mar/Apr 2010. Vol. 19, Iss. 2, p. 121-125 (5 pp.) Young, H.(2010)The Ottawa Citizen. Ottawa, Ont.: May 1, 2010. p. B.7 diamondgirl1228@yahoo.com Research Papers on Assisted SuicideArguments for Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS)Capital PunishmentPersonal Experience with Teen PregnancyGenetic EngineeringThe Masque of the Red Death Room meaningsBook Review on The Autobiography of Malcolm X19 Century Society: A Deeply Divided EraThe Fifth HorsemanMoral and Ethical Issues in Hiring New EmployeesHip-Hop is Art

Friday, February 28, 2020

Female Genital Mutilation Comparing Two Primary Source Articles Essay

Female Genital Mutilation Comparing Two Primary Source Articles - Essay Example The two articles; "Wanjiku: Life of A Traditional Woman" by Jean Davison and "National Bodies, Unspeakable Acts: The Sexual Politics of Colonial Policy Making" by Susan Pedersen have given great insight into the myriad aspects of the custom and the controversy surrounding it. Indeed, both the articles have made it clear that female circumcision had not only cultural significance but the political connotations of the issue had superseded its relevance or non relevance in Kenya, especially in the early and mid twentieth century. It was the time when female circumcision was an intrinsic part of socio-cultural dynamics of Kenya which had become synonymous with the identity of Kikuyu. As can be adjudged by Wanjiku's narration, the inhabitants were deeply rooted in the way of life the "Gikuyu" (i.e the cultural community) proposed. A very strong joint family structure was prevalent and their entire life was concentrated within their circles. Having said so, the custom of Irua which could be a barbaric vestige to our perception was as natural for them as a harvesting season festival or a wedding. The Irua was a custom of central significance to the Kikuyu life. The public ceremony marked a new phase in the life of women, it bonded those who were "initiated" very strongy and established a hierarchical structure in the community. Sir Grigg observed in one his letters to Sidney Webb at the Colonial Office," This faction, through its ill-advised attitude, done more than anything else to delay the emancipation of Kikuyu womanhood".1 Though there was some element of truth to this statement, I believe it is important to target the heart of the matter itself. What led to Irua or Clitoridectomy to occupy such an important position in the life of Kikuyu members in the first place What is the heart of the matter The real trigger As described in Pedersen's text, Historians have sidelined in detail how the estrangement and settlement of white population pockets," the establishment of adjoining "native reserves," the construction of a system of "tribal" authority often at odds with earlier political structures, and the deliberate use of taxation and legislation to restrict Africans' freedom to grow cash crops and to coerce them into wage labor left many Kikuyu with little of their "traditional" life, except perhaps the still-powerful rituals of clitoridectomy and male circumcision." 2 Not surprisingly, Irua became synonymous with Kikuyu pride and thus gained momentum as a tradition that signified national pride. The many sides of the coin The nationalist sentiments on the basis of this custom were fanned as the custom was not allowed to remain confined to the community. It soon catapulted into the pivot around which colonial and nationalist arguments and revolutions were based. While on one

Tuesday, February 11, 2020

Scientific Journals Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Scientific Journals - Term Paper Example BP is British Petroleum (Alexander, 2010). Three months later, the spill oil was blocked and about half of the oil spilled was removed through evaporation, natural dissolution, and human action (Ocean Conservancy, 2010). However, about half of the estimated 4.9 million barrels of oil had already polluted the environment (Ocean Conservancy, 2010). Rather than blaming the BP, a House panel blamed a rig device for failure to cut the oil flow (Doggett, 2010). In May 2010, the BP and the US government jointly estimated that more than 5,000 barrels a day of crude has been leaking into the environment and scientists warned of an environmental damage that could rival the 1989 Exxon spill in Alaska (Ball & Hughes, 2010). Other scientists say, however, that the spill may be more than 10 times the 5,000 barrels-a-day joint estimate of the US government and the BP (Ball & Hughes, 2010). On the month, US scientists estimated that the oil spill â€Å"could cause more of Louisiana’s retreating marshland revert to open water† (Ball and Hughes, 2010, 4th paragraph). U.S. Greenpeace, a leading environmental group, has her own interpretation of the timeline of the BP oil spill disaster (2010). According to the Greenpeace US, as early as 2007, the US Interior Department’s Mineral Management Services (MMS) has acquired data that oil-drilling projects are marked with a history of accidents, fires, and deaths (Greenpeace, 2010). In July 2008, a top agency manager of the MMS was criminally charged for having conflicts of interest with oil companies (Greenpeace, 2010). Yet, however, the MMS was allowed to give BP an exclusion from the US National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirement to prepare an environmental impact statement for BP’s drilling operations (Greenpeace, 2010). Based on the â€Å"timeline† of the Greenpeace (2010), the BP oil spill can be blamed to the lax application of US environmental policies as well as to the congruence of

Friday, January 31, 2020

Similar to Liberation Christology Essay Example for Free

Similar to Liberation Christology Essay Until recently, traditional Christian theology was interpreted only by white males. In a modern world things are changing. In her book Consider Jesus, Elizabeth Johnson states that women â€Å"are waking up to their own dignity and finding their own voice† (page 97). Despite the feminist theology movement that Johnson describes, sexism and male dominance is embedded in the culture of the Catholic Church. Women will have equal rights under canon law, the problem is â€Å"Time†, the same thought process of 100 years ago is still active in the Church today. Only when the new generations of clergy is in place can change come. When it comes to the Christological interpretation woman voices can strengthen the debate, but it will take many generations for the old establishment to give way to an equal gender hierarchy. This is a strong argument, because in order for the old establishment to change and accept women, women need to make an effort to actively work to reform the current hierarchy. Johnson describes feminist theology as â€Å"Faith†¦being reflected upon explicitly from the perspective and experience of women† (page 97). Similar to Liberation Christology, in which poor and oppressed have a unique theological interpretation, in feminist theology the dominated group is women who begin to take part in the debate from their unique perspective. There are two main categories of feminist theology. The first is revolutionary feminist theology. As the word revolutionary implies these groups of women are quite radical and completely disassociate themselves with tradition rather than trying to change the minds of the male dominated theology. They do not acknowledge a male deity; instead they worship a female God, a goddess. They do not dwell on Jesus Christ because he was male. Usually these women split from the church and form their own groups arguing that the church is hopelessly stuck in its patriarchal ways. Johnson does not place much importance on these revolutionary feminists because this group has cut themselves off from the Church. The second category of feminist theology is reformist feminist theology. These women share the belief with the revolutionary feminists that there is a â€Å"male-dominated character of the Christian tradition† (p98), but instead of separating from the church, they choose to work from the inside to â€Å"seek the dismantling of the patriarchy and equal justice† (page 98). This approach could be described as â€Å"you catch more flies with honey than you do with vinegar†. Reformists work passively within the church to create change, not trying to dominate but with a view of the earth as shared, where â€Å"the dream of a new heaven and a new earth takes hold†¦ with no one group dominating and no one group subordinated, but each person in his or her own right participating according to their gifts, without preconceived stereotyping, in genuine mutuality† (page 99). The revolutionary theologians approach will ultimately lead to change, because as women are becoming more accepted in positions of power and authority outside of the church, they will become more accepted inside the church. The number of women in post-secondary education and federal government is higher than ever before. These are positive changes, but this kind of change in the church is still years away. Women are half of the human race yet seem to be overlooked in most of human history. The traditional patriarchal structure has defined women’s status and position in society. Reformists hope is to transform this traditional belief that women are second class citizens when in fact they have been just as influential in social as well as in Christological history. Mary Magdalene, the â€Å"apostle to the apostles† (109) and the other women of the Bible are â€Å"given several times in the gospels but have become a forgotten part of the story† (109). How is it that they were so important back then, yet so left out of the debate today? Perhaps our evolution as a male-dominated society has spilled over into the church – woman by no fault of their own were not allow to attend school or a higher level after high school, this alone caused a gap for woman in the church. The bible was written and interpreted by males while woman were denied economic, legal, and educational rights, â€Å"A prejudice is the inability to deal with the otherness of people who are different from what is considered â€Å"oneself†. In patterns of androcentric thinking the male is centered. These samplings are what influences canon law and has shaped Catholic tradition†. (p100 101) The consequence of sexism for woman is a lack of self-esteem and self-confidence; for men it is a narrow band of human characteristics; strong, rational, in control. (p 102) If the sexism could stop, society as a whole could benefit.

Thursday, January 23, 2020

Malawi and Tobacco Essay -- Trade Tobacco Malawi Essays

Malawi and Tobacco What strategies can Malawi use to overcome problems relating to a change in demand of its main export, tobacco. QUESTION- what strategies can Malawi use to overcome problems relating to a change in demand of its main export, tobacco? Malawi, a LEDC, located in Southern Africa, has a population of 10 million. Tobacco is its main export and this provides the majority of the countries export revenues. It has become dependant on exporting tobacco to firms based in MEDC's such as the United States. Demand for cigarettes has recently decreased because of health and ethical reasons. Cigarettes, has reached the end on its product lifecycle. However South East Asia remains a growing market, because of the effects of globalisation and dumping. The decrease in demand is a major problem for Malawi, a country that is not market orientated or market aware. Decline in demand for cigarettes will obviously have a direct effect on demand for tobacco because they are complimentary products. With decreased demand for its crops of tobacco, Malawi will find itself in a very dangerous situation that will not only threaten its economic position but the very lives of its population. Another concern that Malawi must take into account is the state of the tobacco industry. At present the market could be described as an oligopoly (see appendix) where suppliers compete on price. The outcome of this is that the firms involved have a high market share and therefore have much power to control supply and demand. They have the power to control prices of tobacco and they can exploit countries like Malawi. The national economy is dictated by exports of tobacco. The decreased revenue, due to loss of demand, will an... ...E UK (BRANDS): Two firms, Gallaher and Imperial Tobacco, who between them, control around 80% of the market, dominate the cigarette and tobacco market in the United Kingdom. One other major firm, British American Tobacco (BAT), manufactures cigarettes in the UK but sells almost all of them abroad. In 1999 BAT merged with Rothmans International thereby increasing its share of the world tobacco market to 15.4%, just behind the world leader Philip Morris which controls 17% of the global market. BIBLIOGRAPHY http://www.ash.org.uk http://www.tobacco.org http://www.mcspotlight.org http://www.cdc.gov http://www.sas.upenn.edu/African_Studies/Country_Specific/Malawi.html http://allafrica.com www.google.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk www.altavista.com www.theguardian.co.uk Nuffield Business and economics- Students Book

Wednesday, January 15, 2020

Han and Roman Attitudes toward Technology

From the around second century B. C. E. to the third century C. E. the Han and Roman attitudes toward technology were different in how they took pride in some of their inventions with the Han accepting the role of the craftsmen and their technology they created showed in documents 1-4. However, the Romans did not do as much of this and did not care as much about the technology and how it could be utilized. This was shown in documents 5-8. Both Han China and the Romans did show a similarity in how their technology, even though it was viewed differently, helped to develop their Empires. Throughout these eight documents, everyone one of these had male from the upper class writing the document. I think an additional document that could be useful in answering the question of what the Han and Roman attitudes toward technology were would be a person from the lower class. This document would be useful because that the upper class did not show interest about the technology that a commoner might have used such as hand tools and other common working items. The Han utilized their technology more to the fullest and took pride in what they invented. In Document 1 it shows that technology was not just used as a luxury, but was used a necessary way to help prevent disaster. In this case the Han were trying to prevent flood and had walls canals and pools. There were also people assigned to inspect and repair these technologies to help their people by preventing floods. The Han took pride in ability to keep their people safe from floods and other disasters. Document 2 focuses more on how the government monopolized the making of tools and made them more cheaply and with less quality than the actual workers themselves did. Then the government raised prices on iron and some of the poor had to digress to older technology. Two examples of this is iron became too expensive and wooden plows were now being used instead of iron. Another example is that salt was too expensive and they couldn’t afford to season their food. Huan Guan takes pride in the technology and feels that the government is not utilizing it proper and feels that the technology is going to waste. Document 3 shows pride in their invention of the pestle and the mortar and how it helped to create very useful technology where, â€Å"The efficiency was ncreased ten times† then later on, â€Å"Benefit was increased a hundredfold. † Document four commends the technology and its usefulness directly contrasting with Document three’s point of view. A reason this may be is that it is government-sponsored and the government is trying to make itself look good. The Romans, however, were not as interested and shows little regard with how technology can affect them. Document five shows this where Cicero shows no admiration of craftsmen or any of their inventions. He says, â€Å"All craftsmen spend their time in vulgar occupations. Cicero and the upper class don’t really have interest in craftsmen technology. Document seven suggests craftsmen did something that anybody could have done and does not really respect them. He is implying that if the upper class doesn’t need the technology, it isn’t important. Now, Plutarch, on the other hand, was very satisfied with the technology of the roads and how nice they are in document six. He brags of Mile Markers and how this technology can be used by eve rybody. Frontinus was also very proud of the technology in Rome. He specifically boasted of the aqueducts and said that they were better than the pyramids of Egypt. This opinion may be a little bias though, because he is the water commissioner for the city of Rome. Even though the Hans and Romans had different views on the use of technology, both of these empires benefitted greatly from the technology that was invented in this time. Plutarch was very excited about the roads in document six, and he had very good reason to be. The roads were kept in very good condition that allowed them to travel throughout their entire empire. This was useful for delivering food across the empire in time of famine and also helped them to travel easier and quicker in time of battle. The Han’s technology also helped them to grow as an Empire and keep their people safe as shown in document one. They had walls, canals, and workers specifically designated to prevent floods. What is shown in these documents is that the Han and Romans have different values placed on technology, but also shows how they view the craftsmen and the people that may benefit from the technologies. The Han valued their technology more and therefore placed more respect on the people who invented, whereas the Romans didn’t not value the technology or the craftsmen nearly as much.